what if crypto Featured

Now is the New Year's Eve monster stock game vs. National Nine Articles, and institutions will definitely not take over in these directions! So it's basically hot money and quantitative initiation, and then after pulling a few boards, I throw the chips to the retail investors who chase high. I don't know how many of the 300 billion board-playing funds are now in the pockets of hot money and quantification.When we adjusted the monetary easing more than expected, the exchange rate did not move; The old US CPI data is favorable for interest rate cuts, and the rise of the US dollar and the fall of non-US currencies are directly reflected. Therefore, it still depends on the detailed rules and policies, otherwise the market funds will not buy it now.

Overnight, European and American stock markets were mixed. Except for the slight decline of the Dow, the large-scale technology stocks in the United States basically rose sharply. However, the Chinese stock index bottomed out and fell by 0.94%, and the A50 index fell by 0.01%, and the external sentiment was neutral.When we adjusted the monetary easing more than expected, the exchange rate did not move; The old US CPI data is favorable for interest rate cuts, and the rise of the US dollar and the fall of non-US currencies are directly reflected. Therefore, it still depends on the detailed rules and policies, otherwise the market funds will not buy it now.Yesterday, the shrinkage of A shares was weak, and the differences between large and small-cap stocks continued to expand. Even in the end, the CSI 1000ETF was still heavy. Recently, hot money and quantification have obviously controlled the market initiative, while machine ticket purchase has been obviously marginalized. So how will A shares go today?

December 12th Morning Post: US stocks hit a new high. Will A shares follow?Today, my specific operation is as follows:After all, the board must be broken or down in the end, and the game is just a personal understanding of funds, emotions and news. It has nothing to do with fundamentals and logic. What is vividly interpreted here is eat small fish, a big fish. When a small fish eats shrimp, the shrimp can only eat dirt.